DIMENSI PRAGMATISME POLITIK DALAM BINGKAI NEGARA DEMOKRASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/htn.v1i1.371Keywords:
democracy, pragmatimse, money politicsAbstract
Democracy is a political system and ideologue that has been widely applied in various countries in the post-cold war world. Democracy tries to become an international political regime that is so gallant and ideal in terms of the system and the dimensions of its use. Democracy does not only discuss matters of state and government, but also issues of basic human values in the form of human rights, humanity, egalitarianism, gender, femininity and even capitalist economic issues which are also closely related to democracy. But another fact occurred, the ideal dimension of democracy shifted to pragmatism and transactional politics with the emergence of the reality of the rampant practice of money politics in Indonesia. The emergence of these things is certainly not in a vacuum and without effort. The issue of money politics has become a big and terrible scourge amid the consolidation and development of democracy in Indonesia today. Political pragmatism occurs not only at the central level in the form of presidential elections but has reached the grass roots, namely elections to villages. So that this is suspected by many parties as part of the emergence of a culture of corruption in Indonesia. In other words, the rampant cases of corruption that occur in Indonesia are more likely to occur because of the extraordinarily large cost politics in the implementation of democracy. Both in terms of subject and political object in Indonesia. So this will become a political pathology that must be addressed immediately. The political pragmatism that occurs in Indonesia has an extraordinary transactional political economy dimension. So this should be a red note for democracy in Indonesia. So the ideals of reform that have been echoed since 1998 can be realized gradually. However, if the problem of money politics is still rife, then the ideals of reform in the form of realizing Indonesia as a democratic country will experience extraordinary distortions.
Downloads
References
A. Mangunhardjana, Isme-Isme dalam..., 89 Muhadam Labolo, Partai Politik dan Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia, Ed. I, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, Cet. I, 2017), 181.
A.V. Dicey, Introduction to The Study of The Law of The Constitution, Edisi ke-3, London: Macmillan and co., (1889), hlm. 175- 176.
Anthony, Butler, 2010, Paying for Politics (Party funding and political change in South Africa and the Global South, Ultra Litho, Johannesburg, hlm. 1
Antoro, B. H. W. (2016). Membangun demokrasi di atas kepentingan rakyat (ilusi kepentingan rakyat). Justitia et Pax, 32(2).
Arthur W. Burk, The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Pierce, Vol. III, (Cambridge,
Dwipayana, A. A. (2009). Demokrasi biaya tinggi: dimensi ekonomi dalam proses demokrasi elektoral di Indonesia pasca orde baru. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 12(3), 257-279.
Fauziah Nurdin, ‘’Kebenaran Menurut Pragmatisme dan Tanggapannya Terhadap Islam,” dalam Jurnal Islam Futura, Vol. XIII, No. II, (T.K: T.P, 2014), 185.
Franz Magnis Suseno, Etika Dasar: Masalah-masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral, (Yogyakarta: Kanisus, 1991), 122
Hakim, A. B., & Muhyidin, M. (2022). Demokrasi dan Politik Biaya Tinggi (High Cost Politics). JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 1(1), 12-22.
Harry C. Boyte, The Citizen Solution: How You Can Make a Difference, St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society, (2008), hlm. 15. Harvard University Press, 1958), 116.
Kuskridho Ambardi, Mengungkap Politik Kartel: Studi tentang Sistem Kepartaian di Indonesia Era Reformasi, (Jakarta: KPG, 2009), 22. legislatif terhadap keberlangsungan demokrasi di indonesia. Notarius, 13(1), 138-153.
Leo Agustino dan Indah Fitriani, Korupsi: Akar, Aktor, dan Locus, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, Cet. I, 2017), 105.
Lihat Aristoteles, Politik, Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya, (2004), hlm, 161. Diterjemahkan dari buku Polities, New York: Oxford University Press, (1995).
Miriam Budiardjo, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, (2003), hlm. 42-44.
Nabila, N., Prananingtyas, P., & Azhar, M. (2020). Pengaruh money politic dalam pemilihan anggota legislatif terhadap keberlangsungan demokrasi di indonesia. Notarius, 13(1), 138-153. Pelajar.hlm. 20-21
Permata, C. Q. N., & Khasanah, N. B. U. (2020). Budaya Money Politics Dan Identity Politics Dalam Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislatif, 93-105.
Plato, The Laws of Plato, Manchester: University of Manchester Press, (1921), hlm. 49.
Roger, S. (2010). Representasi Kepentingan Rakyat pada Pemilu Legislatif 2009. salatiga: Pustaka
Sahroni, A., Prisanto, G. F., Ernungtyas, N. F., & Afriani, A. L. (2020). “POLITIK TANPA MAHAR”: SEMIOTIKA JARGON KOMUNIKASI PARTAI NASIONAL DEMOKRAT DI ERA DEMOKRASI BIAYA TINGGI. SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2).
Solihah, R. (2016). Politik transaksional dalam pilkada serentak dan implikasinya bagi pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia. The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 2(1), 97-109.
Thomas Meyer, Peran Partai Politik dalam Sebuah Sistem Demokrasi: Sembilan Tesis, (Jakarta: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Cet. III, 2012), 22.
Toive Aartolahti, dkk, Grolier: Encyclopedia of Knowledge, Vol. XV, (United States: Acamedic American Encyclopedia, 1997), 173.
Zaprulkhan, Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Analisis Kontemporer, Ed. I, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, Cet. III, 2016), 116.
