Pancasila Sebagai Pondasi Awal Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia

Authors

  • Achmad Syamsudin Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan
  • Sutopo Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v3i01.803

Keywords:

Pancasila, Constitution of 1945, Constitution

Abstract

Pancasila is a noble legacy that was born from the reflections of its founding fathers in the basic formulation of an independent Indonesian State. Pancasila is lifted from the original values ​​of the Indonesian people in which there are customs, culture and religion embodied in the nation's outlook on life. Pancasila is often classified as a middle ideology between the two major world ideologies that are very influential on the state. Pancasila is not communist/marxist and also not liberal/capitalist. The agreement of the Indonesian nation to make Pancasila the nation's way of life today is increasingly apprehensive due to the era of globalization. Pancasila as a weltanschaung (view of life) means that the values ​​of Pancasila are the ethics of the common life of the Indonesian people which have been rooted since ancient times. The actualization of Pancasila is the elaboration of Pancasila values ​​in the form of norms and their realization in the life of the nation and state.      

References

Agus W., 2011. Tugas Akhir “Aktualisasi Nilai Pancasila Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara

Amikom Bernegara”. Yogyakarta : Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika Dan Komputer

Bernegara”. Yogyakarta : Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika Dan Komputer

Dewantara A., (2017). Alangkah Hebatnya Negara Gotong Royong (Indonesia dalam

Dewantara A., (2017). Diskursus Filsafat Pancasila Dewasa Ini.

Kacamata Soekarno).

Kaelan, 2014, Pendidikan Pancasila, Edisi revisi kesepuluh,Paradigma, Yogyakarta

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Downloads

Published

2024-01-28

How to Cite

Achmad Syamsudin, & Sutopo. (2024). Pancasila Sebagai Pondasi Awal Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 3(01), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v3i01.803